Not-so-clever contracts
For the time being at least, human judgment is still a better bet than cold-hearted code
BUSINESS could be such a breeze—if it weren’t for those pesky humans. Imagine contracts that enforce themselves and are not subject to interpretation by, for instance, rent-seeking lawyers. Or envisage autonomous corporations, made up of bundles of automatic agreements, which could send their investors dividends whenever profits reach a certain, specified level and not just when the board of directors has had a good lunch.
This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline “Not-so-clever contracts”
From the July 30th 2016 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the edition
Big box v brands: the battle for consumers’ dollars
American retailers are slugging it out with their suppliers
Welcome to the AI trough of disillusionment
Tech giants are spending big, but many other companies are growing frustrated
China’s battery giant eyes world domination
CATL’s blockbuster listing will power its expansion
American brands have a new image problem
Donald Trump is hurting products from Coca-Cola to Jack Daniel’s
The secrets of public speaking
Lessons from actors on how to give a good presentation
Nvidia’s original customers are feeling unloved and grumpy
Gamers are cross with the chip giant